Former Vice President Walter Mondale (D), who died Monday, led a successful effort to reform the filibuster in 1975, when he was a U.S. senator from Minnesota. Before Mondale and James Pearson (R-Kan.) introduced a resolution to reform cloture, the parliamentary mechanism to end a filibuster, at the beginning of the 94th Congress, a two-thirds majority of senators present and voting were needed to break a filibuster; Mondale and Pearson pushed for three-fifths of all senators voting and present.
Senate Rule XXII, which governed cloture, “in its present form, has protected the right of debate at the expense of the right to decide,” Mondale told his Senate colleagues. “Rule XXII has significantly impaired the ability of this body to function.”
Sen. James Allen (D-Ala.) led the opposition to the measure, and after several rancorous weeks of debate, the Senate agreed to a compromise resolution in which three-fifth of the entire Senate, or 60 senators, had to agree to invoke cloture and thwart a filibuster. That rule still stands for legislative filibusters, though once again there is clamor for reform amid obstruction.
Earlier in his Senate career, Mondale supported a simple majority of 51 senators to quash a filibuster. And he and Pearson briefly set a precedent for a 51-vote cloture, James Wallner explained in 2019. But Mondale had changed his mind by then. “As I see it, it is an issue between the ability to paralyze, on the one hand, and the ability to require full ventilation of an issue, on the other,” he said in 1971. “In my opinion, there are crucial issues which demand full consideration by the Senate.”
By 2011, Mondale was ready for another round of cloture reform. In 1975, senators hoped lowering the threshold to 60 votes from 67 “would preserve debate and deliberation while avoiding paralysis, and for a while it did,” he wrote in a 2011 New York Times op-ed. “But it’s now clear that our reform was insufficient for today’s more partisan, increasingly gridlocked Senate.” Mondale suggested lowering the threshold to 55 votes, or “requiring a filibustering senator to actually speak on the Senate floor for the duration of a filibuster.”
“I still would like to keep some of the filibuster,” Mondale said in 2013. “I think the Senate should be different from the House. I’m looking for that mysterious line between requiring debate and consultation on the one hand and paralysis on the other hand. … What we clearly have today is paralysis.”
More stories from theweek.com
The new HBO show you won’t be able to stop watching
Donald Trump’s most dangerous political legacy
Fauci flubs the freedom question